高中2年级 - 议论文 阅读指导

It is better for children to grow up in relatively poor families or wealthier families?


I do concur with the point that children brought up in relatively poor families are better capable of handling problems of their adult life, than children raised in big cities by relatively wealthier parents. Here, I would verify my statement in the following parts.

Firstly, children of lower income parents are prematurely exposed to the problems of adult life. It will allow them to germinate the abilities for becoming more sophisticated in coping with individual difficulties. In that certain way of lifestyle, more pressure would be exerted on them, facilitating their actions needed for responding to variously difficult life circumstances.

Secondly, In contrast to those who are in wealthier families, children who are taught a wide range of necessary skills for survival, as an adult from a very early age, and accumulated tactful approaches, tend to be more social active. As an example of finding a job, people with social- active mind are more likely to ascertain the employment circumstances, being able to select the most appropriate job for themselves. Hence, the necessary skills they procured can be more practical for providing them better preparation to the entrance of adult social life.

Lastly, children of relatively poor families are highly motivated, for incentives of personal ambition, to achieve success. As going through the difficulties in their lives, experiencing hardships as well as tasting the bitterness of life, they would therefore, culminate the development of spiritual views, learning to strive for their goals for greater ambitions.　

In conclusion, the aforementioned points above, support the idea that children with impoverished backgrounds are more capable of dealing with problems of adult life, incorporating with acquisition of　social skills, early exposure to hardships, and sheer incentives.